RIFLEMAN

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
32
The hearing of AB 342 was held today. Unfortunately, the 4-10 vote resulted in the bill being pushed back for reconsideration; the roll call lacked the necessary 11 Nay votes to be killed.

It may be heard as early as 22-Apr-03 or as late as May.

We need to turn up the heat and generate as great an outpouring of opposition as we did before and during today's meeting.

"The price of liberty is eternal vigilance."
 

sportyg

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
3,307
Reaction score
421
I saw on a couple of other boards yesterday 500 hunters showed up and the bill was shot down... What's correct ???
 

RIFLEMAN

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
32
sportyg,

Technically and officially, the bill is not yet dead. The tally was 4 Yea, 10 Nay and six absent from roll call. Bills require 11 Nay votes to be killed outright and AB342 got only 10. It has been pushed back for "reconsideration"---another vote.

Where the speculation and the calling for victory lies is that the author would need to get all six of the absentees from yesterday's hearing, plus one of the Nay voters to all vote Yea at the next meeting. This does not seem probable, therefore, some organizations are already calling it a victory.

Call me a pessimist, but I don't count my chicks...before the fat lady sings. I won't rest nor make a sigh of relief until I see the 11 Nay votes.

I personally want this upcoming vote to set enough of a precedent (as many Nays as possible) so that it will force the HSUS to reevaluate their strategy and back off of this issue for awhile. The greater the Nay votes, the longer they are likely to not attempt to push this legislation through. That is why I will be doing my damndest to pressure the six absentees to vote Nay in the next go-round.

RIFLEMAN
 

shaginator

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2002
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
0
Just to save me a bit of time, do you know who the six absentees were?

Would indeed be nice to get as many of those as possible to vote "nay"

...and the next step would be to vote the 4 who went "yea" out of office.
 

RIFLEMAN

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
32
Shaginator,

Here is the complete tally for the vote on AB342...


Opposed-

Chairman Joseph Canciamilla (D-Contra Costa County) 916-319-2011
Patty Berg (D-Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Sonoma, Trinity Counties) 916-319-2001
Shirley Horton (R-San Diego County) 916-319-2078
Rick Keene (R-Butte, Lassen, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sierra, Yuba Counties) 916-319-2003
Tim Leslie(R-Alpine, El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento Counties) 916-319-2004
Barbara Matthews (D-Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus Counties) 916-319-2017
Kevin McCarthy (R-Kern, San Bernardino Counties) 916-319-2032
Nicole Parra (D-Fresno, Kern, Kings, Tulare Counties) 916-319-2030
George Plescia (R-San Diego County) 916-319-2075
Lois Wolk (D-Solano, Yolo Counties) 916-319-2008

To be Removed From Office (Supported)-

Mervyn Dymally (D-Los Angeles County) 916-319-2052
Jackie Goldberg (D-Los Angeles County) 916-319-2045
Christine Kehoe (D-San Diego County) 916-319-2076
Fran Pavley (D-Los Angeles, Ventura Counties) 916-319-2041

Abstained-

Alan Lowenthal (D-Los Angeles County) 916-319-2054

Not Present to Vote-

Rudy Bermudez (D-Los Angeles, Orange Counties) 916-319-2056
Ellen Corbett (D-Alameda County) 916-319-2018
Lynn Daucher (R-Orange County) 916-319-2072
Dario Frommer (D-Los Angeles County) 916-319-2043
Todd Spitzer (R-Orange, Riverside Counties) 916-319-2071

RIFLEMAN
 

Hawghunter

Well-known member
Joined
May 29, 2002
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Thanks for the names, locations, and phone numbers. Time for me to call the ones in my area. I'll do it today after work.
Thanks Again,
Mark
<
 

Latest Posts

QRCode

QR Code
Top Bottom