Coulter




cavey

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
1
my vote = wackjob, a waster of breathable air
 

beastslayer

Banned
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
0
Apparently her visit to her shrink is not working.

She should change psychiatrist.

May I suggest electric shock theraphy?
 

foulshot

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 2, 2001
Messages
4,706
Reaction score
0
Actually, I find her point to be somewhat true. If you take a look at the nature of his behavior and compare it to ancient rome, she's got a point.
 

Bullfrog 31581

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
2,142
Reaction score
28
Actually, I understand her reasoning as well, in as far that 1) Bill Clinton obviously doesn't respect women and 2) a man that disrespects women so much might seek out other men to have "meaningful" relationships with because such a person would only view other men as his equals.

There was a guy I knew from the 6th grade to graduation that over the course of that time had slept with 80+ girls from various schools in our locality. He purposely sought out virgins so that he could take their virginity and then break up with them. I recall that in the 11th grade he was going as far as to date 6th graders. He had no respect for women and enjoyed doing whatever he could to cause as much hurt as possible. From what I was able to pick up, his mother had left his father for someone else and he hated all other women because of her. Anyhow, the only people he respected was other guys and although I never knew for sure, he said and did some things that made me think he might have been bi-sexual. Although I have no idea whether Clinton is gay, it would make sense that because of his utter lack of respect for women, he might follow a pattern similar to the guy I knew in high-school.

I also agree with foulshot. The more promiscuous someone is, the more likely that they will fall into deeper sexual perversion. I doubt many kiddie-porn addicts start out looking at child porn. They probably start out with soft-core stuff and then progress to harder and harder porn to get the same "high." Its probably the same for someone that lives a promiscuous lifestyle. The more people they sleep with, the more deviant they have to become in order to get the same enjoyment out of the activity.
 

beastslayer

Banned
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
0
BF,

You could be Coulter's shrink and teach her a thing or two.

But you should have stopped at "...men who hate woman would end up not having any meaningful relationship.." If I recall my reading correctly, it does not conclude that they will be or are homosexual.

Well, unless this is your still unpublished study (LOL).
 

Bullfrog 31581

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
2,142
Reaction score
28
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>
But you should have stopped at "...men who hate woman would end up not having any meaningful relationship.." If I recall my reading correctly, it does not conclude that they will be or are homosexual.[/b]
beastslayer,

I didn't say "...men who hate woman would end up not having any meaningful relationship" and would definately turn out to be homosexual.

Here is what I said:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>
2) a man that disrespects women so much might seek out other men to have "meaningful" relationships with because such a person would only view other men as his equals.[/b]
.

I used the term "might."

Again, I have no idea if Bill Clinton is a homosexual or bi-sexual. But I wouldn't be to terribly surprised if he turned out to be (and even less so if Hillary is).

Edited to add: I don't think Coulter should have made those statements, for no other reason that it wasn't wise to go on national (liberal) television and acuse an ex-president of being gay without any hard proof or use a phrase like "gaydar" and not expect everyone to jump on it. I'm just adding to this topic because I don't think some of the logic she used for her argument is as outlandish as it first seems.
 

beastslayer

Banned
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bullfrog 31581 @ Aug 7 2006, 04:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Edited to add: I don't think Coulter should have made those statements, for no other reason that it wasn't wise to go on national (liberal) television and acuse an ex-president of being gay without any hard proof or use a phrase like "gaydar" and not expect everyone to jump on it. I'm just adding to this topic because I don't think some of the logic she used for her argument is as outlandish as it first seems.[/b]
Agree with you on this and her: Party of rapist, Godless = liberal remarks. Anyway, I find her amusing so she's providing some of my entertainment. She's also a fodder and source of materials for those late night stand up comedy shows.
 


Top Bottom