Bwana Turtle

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
757
Reaction score
0
We adopted a round with questionable lethality to fight a war we were never supposed to win. Makes perfect sense to me. Rules of engagement, anyone ?
<
 

CaliDuckPro

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
1,268
Reaction score
1
The lethality of this round has been in question since the weapon was produced. Not only is the 5.56mm round an ineffective round, but the M-16 is a POS. Especially in the desert, so I've heard. I've never fired a rifle that jammed so frequently and required CONSTANT lubrication. They're worthless.

The guy got it right when he said, "There is no such thing as a well-aimed shot in combat, because combat is fought by scared 18-year-olds who haven't been trained enough and are in a place they've never seen before." However, it's very contradicting of him trying to bolster the effectiveness and capability to carry more ammo. A misplaced shot with a 7.62 will do far more damage than a misplaced shot of a 5.56. Every shot isn't going to be center mass, but I'd rather hit the enemy with a larger round to increase my chances. The ability to carry more rounds does absolutely no good when you have to shoot the enemy 5-7 times to stop the threat.



Same thing can be said about the M-9 pistol (9mm beretta). Very ineffective. A lot of complaints.

Bring back the M-14! I know a lot of guys try to get their hands on one over there in the sand box. Same with the old 1911 .45s. I guess they just don't make weapons like they used to.
 

fossilman

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 20, 2004
Messages
3,488
Reaction score
16
The early M-16's were and are garbage..But have fired 1000's of rounds of ammo from the newer models,while in the Army-Never had a jam at all...
Also the bullet from a M-16 just doesn't pass through a person,when it enter's it tumbles and will come out in a different area...
A hard wound to treat(enemies)...
I have one friend that has a M-16 ,he used it in Vietnam and that's the only rifle he own's...Deer hunts,coyotes,etc...Just loves it...
To each his own on rifle's and pistol's-can't please everyone....
<
 

CaliDuckPro

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
1,268
Reaction score
1
You're absolutely right.. the 5.56 is meant to "tumble." However, it has to hit something solid (bone) for it to tumble.

It's like shooting a high powered .22

Of course, it's all personal preference.. unfortunately in the military, personal preference doesn't amount to squat.
 

fdkay

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
It does not have to hit bone to begin tumbling. As soon as any FMJ bullet enters any medium heavier than air, it begins to de-stabilize. Some sooner than others, with the 5.56 55 or 62 grain bullet, this requires at least 2700 fps of retained velocity, with the ever decreasing barrel lengths, this becomes problematic.
 

DAYSTALKER

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
375
Reaction score
2
From my understanding, they use the smaller round to wound rather than to terminate; it takes more men to tend to the wounded than the dead, Hence, less men fighting!!
 

Latest Posts

QRCode

QR Code
Top Bottom