snake river rufus
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2005
- Messages
- 78
- Reaction score
- 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WildlifeBranch @ Nov 4 2007, 11:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Thanks for the link, i'll use it.
Hi, The AZ g&f information is the information leading me to believe that there were no biologists involved in the study. We were dicussing it on another board.While I would not go as far as Snake River did, we in CDFG do have some concern that some of the work is being done, and conclusions being drawn, by scientists who are not ecologists/biologists. There are however biologists involved in the condor work, as there are DVMs.
Condor work can surely be shown to need more work on food habits and behavior-- ie more field studies than laboratory studies. Hopefully, this last year of focus and scrambling has adequately shown where data on condor and what affects them are lacking.
In the biologist/ecologist versu DVM thinking, there has long been concern that DVM's were too focused on the individual animal while we bio/ecol. types think in terms of populations.
Snake R. (or others) -- send an email to wildlifestrategy@dfg.ca.gov with "method of take" in the subject to get the env. doc. on this topic from dfg. Suggest looking at App. 3.
AZ game & fish website also has some of the science-- AZ situation is way different than CA though.[/b]
Thanks for the link, i'll use it.