spectr17

Administrator
Admin
Joined
Mar 11, 2001
Messages
70,011
Reaction score
1,007
Man poaches elk, loses guns

June 5, 2003

By DOUG HIGGS, Herald and News (Klamath Falls) Staff Writer

A Bend man convicted of poaching an elk in Klamath County last fall has been stripped of his right to hunt again, or even to own firearms.

A jury in Klamath County Circuit Court on Wednesday found Jack Dennis Waterfield, 53, guilty of first-degree theft for illegally killing an elk on private property near the Deschutes County line.

Waterfield was also sentenced to five days in jail and ordered by Judge Rodger Isaacson to pay $1,500 restitution to the Department of Fish and Wildlife.

The jury of seven women and five men deliberated for 20 minutes before finding Waterfield guilty of the crime that was committed Nov. 8.

The crime was discovered by police as a result of a call to a "tip line" sponsored by the Oregon Hunters' Association and the Fish and Wildlife Service, according to Klamath County Deputy District Attorney Mark Costello, who prosecuted the case.

A search warrant was served at Waterfield's address, and Oregon State Police officers found the remains of an elk hanging on his property.

The prosecution also presented as evidence a letter written by Waterfield in which he outlined his intentions to poach the elk, and of his later talking about poaching the elk after the crime was committed, Costello said.

Because his conviction was on a felony charge, Waterfield will not be allowed to have a firearm in his possession.

"We hope this case sends a message to those who hunt illegally in Klamath County," said Klamath County District Attorney Ed Caleb.

End article

==========================================

What do you think? Is this too harsh or is it the message we need to send to poachers? A small fine, loss of a rifle and a year or two hunting seasons doesn't seem to be working in most states.
<
 

scruffnbeez

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
0
I think it is suitable punishment.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>
The prosecution also presented as evidence a letter written by Waterfield in which he outlined his intentions to poach the elk, and of his later talking about poaching the elk after the crime was committed, Costello said.[/b]
By his actions before and after the fact, I don't think he thought he would get in any trouble.
<


<
 

Oregon Archer

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
1,176
Reaction score
7
thats probably one of the stiffest penalties i have ever heard of being levied on a poaching case here in Oregon and i LIKE IT!!!
i wish more people would be dealt with in the same manner as this ass. he got everything he deserved as far as im concerned.
<
 

Speckmisser

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2001
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
27
Without harsh penalties, there is no reason for the average poacher to be much concerned about being caught. A fine here, the loss of a weapon there... obviously there's not much deterrent effect.

I'm glad to see the system getting serious about poachers. I hope the trend spreads.

<
 

wildbirdhunter

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2001
Messages
1,339
Reaction score
0
Most professional poachers think the laws a joke anyway. Hell you can get a larger fine for parking in a handicap parking shot then for poaching. Yes this is a step in the right direction.
It’s one think to do this because you need to feed your family but a lot of guys do it for a trophies and never keep the meat or for money.
WBH
 

DKScott

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 15, 2002
Messages
2,909
Reaction score
0
The prohibition on gun possession was because it was a felony conviction. That is standard for any felony conviction. That this case involved wildlife seems incidental to that part of the punishment.
 

huntducks

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 15, 2001
Messages
3,076
Reaction score
0
Just remember one thing, when govt. starts they don't know when to stop.

The problem with laws today it's either black or white no excuses zero tolarance.
 

doghouse95

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2001
Messages
2,307
Reaction score
0
I agree with the punishment, but this story does bring some questions to mind.
Why did he wright this letter? Was he bragging, or was he having problems with the Elk doing damage on and to his property?
I trust the jury sorted all of this out. I was just wondering about, "the rest of the story."
 
Top Bottom