dirtpoor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
800
Reaction score
19
Hmmm... just a thought and I know it's probably illegal, but when I lived in Arkansas I knew some guy's who deceided to populate an area that they loved to hunt but didn't have a good population of hog's (public land) so they chipped in and bought 2 boar's and 8 sow's kept them in a pen for thirty day's until most of the sow's were pregnant and then released them in the area that needed more huntable hog's. they planted them after deer season so that they wouldn't get shot by deer hunter's and according to them in 2 years they had hog's up the wazoo. I'm not advocating anything illegal, but it seem's to me that the pig tag money keep's going up and fish and game do nothing for us public land hunter's except take advantage of our situation.
 

bayedsolid

Forever Hunting
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
964
Reaction score
0
I've always thought that the least the state could do with the hogs they pay to have trapped and killed out of the parks would be to release them on some public ground. Too expensive I guess....and the fact that nobody really likes hogs (forest service, BLM, parks service, etc..).
 

BOWUNTR

Well-known member
Joined
May 21, 2002
Messages
2,372
Reaction score
13
It's been done several times in So Ca. Santa Ana River, Mojave River and Banning has been stocked (illegally) with wild hogs. They are flourishing and being controlled by tax dollars, not hunting license dollars. Be careful in what you do. It might backfire. Ed F
 

Cahunter

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
806
Reaction score
2
I would love to see them do that. Start with cottenwood then you could move on to camp BOB. I have talked to my buddy, he has a ranch near stoneyford, about doing that very thing. There are a few hogs on his ranch but not enough.
 

MikenSoCo

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
6
Sounds great but it won't happen. They would never introduce a non-indigenious species into an area devoid of them. Look at the turkey planting debate......
<
 

superduty

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 18, 2004
Messages
2,390
Reaction score
32
If sombody would illegaly plant wild pigs on public land then I would be the first to help out the state with some deprovation problems.
<
<
I know a lay of land not too far from me that every time I drive by with the wife I say "boy, wouldn't it be nice if there was pigs on that property?" I don't think the residence in the area and the cattle ranchers would take too well to it. Most of California mentality this far Southern is anti anyways.
<
 

Rancho Loco

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 29, 2002
Messages
5,546
Reaction score
3
Invasive introduced species..
Not a good idea, and yes it would be illegal.
 

BGH831

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
634
Reaction score
0
The pigs are doing to much damage to the state to ever think they would advocate planting as of now eradication is on the playbook no proliferation.
Kill em' all then take up squierll shooting :)
 

larrysogla

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
3,068
Reaction score
24
Pig introduction in pig-free areas of California are illegal. However, there have been pig harvests in some previously pig-free area like the Silverwood Lake area in the San Bernardino Nat. Forest. However, most pigs will be hunted down, killed & harvested before a truly viable population can take hold. There are some small populations in the Mojave River Drainage between Hesperia & the SBNF & a pig population in the Santa Ana river in Orange County. The Mojave population is hampered by the arid area & the Santa Ana River is a no hunting area.
<
 

Loye

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
738
Reaction score
1
They stock trout. Why not stock pigs ?
 

boarhunter67

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
522
Reaction score
9
I know where I live some hogs mysteriously made it onto public land out in the water district. The DFG were eventually called and they hired someone to come in and erradicate them. Most of the hunters were pretty upset about taxpayer money being used to get rid of hunting possibilities. Somewhere close to 300 pigs were killed. I heard they just left the pigs to rot. The property they were on is just fields and wetlands.
<
 

Speckmisser

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2001
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
27
Besides being illegal, planting on public land would more than likely only result in the pigs moving to private land.

The problem now isn't so much that there aren't any hogs on public land, but that the habitat to hold them isn't there. For the most part, huntable public lands in CA can't compete with nearby farmlands for food and water sources.

Add to that the pressure that productive public land gets (word gets out, no matter how well you can keep a secret), and I'd lay good odds that if you plant hogs they won't stay on that public land very long. They'll go where there's less pressure and better feed/water.

The bright side, for those who don't have an issue with an invasive, non-native species, is that the hogs are taking care of distributing themselves pretty well. They're showing up in the Sierra foothills. Hogs have moved along the coast, all the way up to Oregon. I believe that only the urban sprawl of LA and the adjacent desert is keeping them from spreading down south.

The Central Coast still has the highest kill percentage, but many other counties are moving up at a respectable clip, and counties that never showed up on the hunter's "report card" are being added to the list.
 
Top Bottom