6x7

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
18
Seems like the spencville wildlife area and beal AFB would have been a good place for tule elk.
 

ds2

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
191
Reaction score
1
Suavegato, the Tule elk in the West Tinemaha Mountain hunt are located just below the east ridge of the sierras. This area rivals any elk country people have hunted and was so nasty, a packer would not pack his stock in there due to their danger. Helped my friend Joel this last weekend. Beautiful country, very high, trecherous long hike into the back of the Sierra's.
 

db 183

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
Messages
1,631
Reaction score
26
They were not transplanted or released.

Thanks. I thought the story sounded a little fishy but it was told to me by two different people...one that worked for the US Forest service and one from Fish and Game so I believed them.
 

DFGELK

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
320
Reaction score
28
Don't you know you can not believe fish and game. It is actually fairly common because fish and game has a lot of people working on many different things and most do not know what goes on in a different program. I know almost knothing about fish but people ask me about fishing regs and so on all the time. I have to refer them to someone who does know but if they ask a quick question I will give them my opinion maybe it is right or maybe it is wrong. But what happens is they will say the biologist from fish and game said... Does not matter that I am not a fish biologist. Be curious who you talked to from fish and game, warden, hatchery person, biologist?

Joe
 

Flinch

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
84
Reaction score
4
Joe/DFGELK,

To show my ignorance, how are the Sierra Nevada Mtns different than the Rockies in CO, WY, UT, MT, and the Mtns of Id, WA, and OR (that border and share the Cascades) with CA? Is it the lack or possible difference of surrounding habitat?

Thanks ...Mike
 

DFGELK

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 24, 2006
Messages
320
Reaction score
28
View attachment elk spread NA.doc I am not sure how they are different or to what degree those mountain ranges are different. But there are no historically records of elk in the Sierra. Oh, there may be one or two references as elk to tend to travel a lot (same with antelope in the Mojave, etc). It was most likely a distribution barrier of some sort such as the great basin, etc. Here is a map that depicts the spread of elk in North America. For what it is worth.

Joe
 

WildlifeBranch

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
608
Reaction score
56
Joe/DFGELK,

To show my ignorance, how are the Sierra Nevada Mtns different than the Rockies in CO, WY, UT, MT, and the Mtns of Id, WA, and OR (that border and share the Cascades) with CA? Is it the lack or possible difference of surrounding habitat?

Thanks ...Mike

Can help some-- It is also the age of the mountain ranges with the Sierra being far younger. Fly over Sierra (mostly granite or forest) compared to Rockies (large aspen parklands and open meadow areas). When we started my project near Sonora Pass in the 80s, we invited 3 of the top ungulate ecologists in the country (Phil Urness-UT, Jack Ward Thomas-USFS-OR, and Richard Mackie-MSU-MT) to spend a few days touring (poker and drinking.>> sheesh) our project area. They were surprised that we (CA) allowed domestic livestock grazing at all because of the lack of abundant foraging habitat for a grazer. Fun times. those guys were hopefully not the last of "old school" thinking. Eric
 

Flinch

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
84
Reaction score
4
Can help some-- It is also the age of the mountain ranges with the Sierra being far younger. Fly over Sierra (mostly granite or forest) compared to Rockies (large aspen parklands and open meadow areas). When we started my project near Sonora Pass in the 80s, we invited 3 of the top ungulate ecologists in the country (Phil Urness-UT, Jack Ward Thomas-USFS-OR, and Richard Mackie-MSU-MT) to spend a few days touring (poker and drinking.>> sheesh) our project area. They were surprised that we (CA) allowed domestic livestock grazing at all because of the lack of abundant foraging habitat for a grazer. Fun times. those guys were hopefully not the last of "old school" thinking. Eric

Thanks Eric and Joe... it make sense about the granite part of the Sierra (although the majority of it seems primarily in the YNP region - and a little N and S). Also, the map is interesting momevent seems to be least path of resistance - to CA anyway
 

Tag Stew

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2009
Messages
245
Reaction score
1
Wild Heer and I saw that same bull opening weekend, right where 49 takes that corner between sierraville and Loyalton. We too could'nt believe it, he was just hanging out with the cattle both times we saw him. kinda cool.
 

lewdogg21

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
Can help some-- It is also the age of the mountain ranges with the Sierra being far younger. Fly over Sierra (mostly granite or forest) compared to Rockies (large aspen parklands and open meadow areas). When we started my project near Sonora Pass in the 80s, we invited 3 of the top ungulate ecologists in the country (Phil Urness-UT, Jack Ward Thomas-USFS-OR, and Richard Mackie-MSU-MT) to spend a few days touring (poker and drinking.>> sheesh) our project area. They were surprised that we (CA) allowed domestic livestock grazing at all because of the lack of abundant foraging habitat for a grazer. Fun times. those guys were hopefully not the last of "old school" thinking. Eric

Very plausible explanation and it makes sense. Thank you very much for the explanation as my hunting buddies and I have speculated about this many times, partially due to a desire to have more Elk hunting opportunities in the state.
 

Latest Posts

QRCode

QR Code
Top Bottom