DBAR

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
233
Reaction score
3
Maybe they will put out a few tags. Oh wait we're california...it will never happen!!!
 

WildlifeBranch

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
608
Reaction score
56
awesome pic. 1st thought was photoshopped !

of course, livestock operators can get a depredation permit if their stock are being attacked.
 

easymoney

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2003
Messages
10,522
Reaction score
101
wildlifebranch,
What about here on the central coast when we find multiple lion kills of deer?
When will the AB be reversed and a lion season opened?
 

WildlifeBranch

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
608
Reaction score
56
wildlifebranch,
What about here on the central coast when we find multiple lion kills of deer?
When will the AB be reversed and a lion season opened?


Todays FG commission meeting discussed a couple of times that hunters represent "1% of California."

from latest figures I looked up:

hunting licenses sold 2008/Calif 2008 pop est.=

301,968/36,756,666= 0.82% of California population hunts.:smiley_doh:

I don't think there would be a reversal of law based on impact to wildlife, [in part, continuing on the 1991 Proposition 117 theme] however, should lions become more of a threat to human life and property, that might shift the sentiment.

Eric
 

dlovato

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
240
Reaction score
6
Eric - nice statistics - but where's your graph!

:)

- Darryl

p.s. What's going to happen in 2020 when Prop 117 expires??? Will the DFG support it's renewal (try to keep the $30mil/yr) or put forth some effort to show that it might have been a "bad idea" for voters to exclude management of one species... i.e. Tie DFG's hands in balancing populations across the board... Hard to manage all wildlife in CA, except for one - which has a big impact on all the others.

99% of california voters "will" listen to what DFG says - minus the extremists on both sides of the issue. 11 years and counting...
 

WildlifeBranch

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
608
Reaction score
56
hmm.... you've been waiting for that one.

what $30 million/yr? there was no new money provided with Prop 117; but existing funds were to be spentfor acquisition etc, to save deer/lion habitat. These are generally funds within the Wildlife Conservation Board.

the department said yes to a SLO bear hunt just last month. it only took a minivan-full's worth of people to bring that to a halt...

eric
 

dlovato

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
240
Reaction score
6
Yes, Eric - I have been waiting for that ;-)

Anyway - I thought Prop 117 specifically generated 30 Mil via new taxes/etc that specifically must be spent as you say... (not all bad uses of the money - not saying that)... But it did allocated, if I read this right, $30 mil in new revenue for wildlife.

<http://www.mountainlion.org/prop117guide.asp>

- Darryl
 

dlovato

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
240
Reaction score
6
Eric - Just for you... Hope you get a chuckle out of it - it's a pretty sad pie chart. No wonder you didn't create it along with the raw #'s :)

dlovato-albums-misc-picture384-hunterandnon.gif


- Darryl
 

savvyfm3

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Saw this in the Gilroy Dispatch a few weeks ago. Cats are pretty thick around here and I see a few more every year as I drive about.
 
Top Bottom