grtwythunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2001
- Messages
- 1,907
- Reaction score
- 0
Thank you Bishop.
Scott
Scott
If you get a handle on the rest of the breeding adults, leaving a litter of piglets to die of starvation (or mercifully, to a predator) is not necessary. Granted, the dynamics of depredation work differ between rifle/bow and dog, but I don't think that the success of Hogskin's efforts to minimize hog depredation hinges on taking this wet sow.So how does a rancher get rid of the pigs that are destroying his family business, is you leave the wet sows and their litters? Dosen't seem to make much sense. Shoot a few adult pigs and leave a sow and a litter of 8-12 piglets. The way pigs multiply you'll never get a handle on the problem.[/b]
Yes, but at what cost? Clearly Hogskin is not too comfortable with the practice, otherwise he would not have brought it up. Should he put aside his own personal ethics to please the landowner?The purpose of the depredation hunt here is to remove a destructive, invasive, non-native pest animal from the property.[/b]
Well it's obvious that Paul's a little torn between his desire to be a hunter, and the property owners desire to have him be an exterminator.Originally posted by RIFLEMAN@Dec 23 2005, 05:09 PM
Yes, but at what cost? Clearly Hogskin is not too comfortable with the practice, otherwise he would not have brought it up. Should he put aside his own personal ethics to please the landowner?
When someone begins to concede their personal principles to something pragmatic like the opportunity to hunt hogs on a property, they are lost. That my friend, is the definition of corruption.
True, which means that he must emphasize the quality of the result above the quality of the experience. He can still do so without subverting his principles or dishonoring the agreement with the owner.But the truth of the matter is the property owner has allowed him to hunt the pigs as a depreditation tool...This is not a sport hunt. The purpose is the extermination of the pigs on the owners private land[/b]
Exactly what I suggested; inform the landowner of his concerns to be fair to them. If they deem Hogskin to be an asset, they will either tolerate his reservations or accept methods that would allow him to humanely dispatch or catch the piglets.If he feels that he can't do that, then he needs to tell the property owner, and see if the owner is OK with that, or wants to bring in someone who will do the job.[/b]
When someone begins to concede their personal principles to something pragmatic like the opportunity to hunt hogs on a property, they are lost. That my friend, is the definition of corruption.
Thats true enough. Thats why you shouldn't base your principles on emotions.
Rolling up your sleeves and doing a job no matter how ugly, we call that gettin er dunn!!! :xmas-hat:
I feel your pain. Sometimes us hunters are an ironic lot. My wife has no problem killing ants and spiders. I don't. If I see a spider, I figure it's got as much right to live as I do. I take them out of the bathtub or wherever I see 'em and relocate them . Ants are harder to relocate, so I just tolerate them. Freaks out my two girls.Originally posted by Hogskin@Dec 23 2005, 08:12 AM
I’ve got a property in central cal that I’ve been hunting for several months now. It belongs to a client of mine and is a full functioning horse ranch. They have a hog problem – they root in the pastures and on the track - and the owners worry one of their prize horses may become injured as a result. The owners, particularly the wife, are dyed-in-the-wool animal lovers and contribute a good chunk of change to various animal rights organizations. I was surprised when I floated the trial balloon about shooting the hogs for them and they bit on it.
Yeah, except for the piglets left to starve.Well it sounds like Arturo and his family got some very appriciated meat, the owners are happy, and you got a good place to pig hunt in the future. Sounds like a "win win" situation.[/b]
The issue I raised was not about the evils of killing and eating piglets or other young animals. Rather, it was just the opposite. If the mother is to be killed for whatever reason, so too should the piglets. A quick and humane kill by rifle or bow is much better than leaving the piglets to starve.I can't emphasize this enough, but I try. Go to a Luau and your eating baby pig.
Order veal in a restaurant and your eating baby cow. My family used to get a 25-30 lb. baby wild pig for Xmas dinners. Since then I have taken every opportunity to kill baby wild pigs every chance I get and I shall endeavor to do so in the future. I don't feel bad. nor guilty, nor bothered by it. i got pictures bvut in case this all strikes your sensibilities as evil...[/b]
I am the same way. My wife makes fun of me because I catch spiders by hand and set live traps for mice so that I can relocate them.My wife has no problem killing ants and spiders. I don't. If I see a spider, I figure it's got as much right to live as I do. I take them out of the bathtub or wherever I see 'em and relocate them[/b]