Roybean

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm thinking of spending the bucks for the Leica Range Finder Binoculars and can't decide whether to buy the 10X42 or the 8X56. Any recommendations?
 

Chuck N. Lead

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
0
Is weight a factor? What's the difference in weight between the two? What's more important; light gathering or weight? What type of hunting will you do with it? If there are really heavy and cumbersome, they will spend little time in the field. I hunt and my biggest battle is being weighed down with STUFF. I miss the days when I hit the field with a gun, ammo and knife. Now I have all kinds of STUFF.

The hunting that I do, I would pick the lighter of the two so I could also take it when hunting ground hogs as well as deer. I don't use my rangfinder for deer because I don't need to fooling around with it when I should be shouldering my rifle. I don't use a scope with an adjustable objective when deer hunting for the same reason.

Good luck
 

Val

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 25, 2003
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
4
I have and prefer my binoculars separate from my rangefinders. The binoculars are a compact set of 10X42 Leupold WindRivers, which I wear on a harness, on my chest. The rangefinders are a set of Leica 1200s I wear on my belt on my side. I only use the rangefinders when I'm setting up on the ground before dawn and dusk to rangefind the terrain to get a good idea about the range if a deer appears. There usually is time to use them when finding grazing pigs. I use my binoculars much more than the rangefinder and a good lightweight set is very important.
 

Roybean

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
My thoughts were it would be best to have all-in-one so I wouldn't have to carry two separate items. I know the Leica is expensive but they are a quality item.
 

Speckmisser

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2001
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
27
I didn't realize the 8x had a 56mm objective. I'll trust that you've read correctly.

Anyway, that's probably the route I'd go. The 10x would be fine too, but you don't gain that much except more visible shake.

I have the Bushnell rangefinding binocular, and I've become quite enamoured of it, especially for bowhunting. Occasionally, I'd like a little better glass for rifle hunting, since I do a lot more glassing at longer ranges.

The Leica is leaps and bounds better than the Bushnell, and while it is a lot of money, it's an excellent unit. The rangefinder functions are way better, and the glass is a world apart in quality. The display is also a lot better, especially for doing more glassing. If you have it to spend, then don't even bother to look back.
 

XDHUNTER

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
1,546
Reaction score
29
Also interested in getting the leica geovid brf 10x42brf any one know's a good place to buy?
 

FresnoHunter

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Messages
658
Reaction score
6
xdhunter

try this guy, Doug 212-753-5128
gr8fuldoug@aol.com


He posts alot on monstermuleys.com, optics section of the forum. Lots of people on that site giving him praise for no BS type of service. He is an authorized dealer, I personally checked this out myself and
I bought a Nikon Monarch ATB 10x42 for 249.00 total price.
I think if you give him a call or drop an email you might find what your looking for.
 

XDHUNTER

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
1,546
Reaction score
29
THANK'S FRESNOHUNTER............. I WILL GIVE HIM A CALL.
 

BOHNTR

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
1,371
Reaction score
273
Doug is a good source for those binos. I have owned a pair of the 10x42 BRF for two years now. UNREAL glass and rangefinder......the best of both worlds.....you won't be disappointed, IMO.
 

Latest Posts

QRCode

QR Code
Top Bottom